Review of Moonbirds "Six Deadly Sins": Lessons from blue-chip NFTs

Written by @whaleswoosh, Compiled by: Daily Planet

This article focuses on how Moonbirds "reduced" from the highly anticipated next BAYC to the NFT project in Web3 that has been heavily hyped and its price has repeatedly bottomed out. (Odaily Note: According to Blur data, the floor price of Moonbirds as of press time is 2.05 ETH)

Recently, because Kevin made some controversial remarks on Twitter Space (Odaily Note: When Kevin talked about BAYC, he said that if it is denominated in USD, BAYC’s drop from the high point is even greater, and Moonbirds should not be blamed only. The comments caused dissatisfaction in the community), Moonbirds and its co-founder Kevin Rose once again became the focus of the NFT market, I think this is a good opportunity to look back, how Moonbirds and its parent company PROOF fell into the situation of "everyone screams" What about?

The start of Moonbirds is very promising. Tens of thousands of people have signed up for their pre-sale. The sale price is 2.5 ETH. Its founder, Kevin Rose, is even known as the "NFT leader". In the following days and weeks, the base price soared to 40 ETH (valued at about $120,000 at the time), and since then, the floor has fallen by more than 95%. The decline was larger than that of any other blue-chip NFT project in the same period.

![From blue chip to "blue sorrow", a detailed count of the "six deadly sins" of Moonbirds] (https://img.gateio.im/social/moments-40baef27dd-87eb4eb1c7-dd1a6f-62a40f)

In my opinion, there are six main reasons for this:

**1. Ryan Carson is the former COO of PROOF, he left the project a few days after the pre-sale, which is not accepted by people. **His performance damaged PROOF's reputation. (Odaily Note: Ryan Carson launched the NFT fund 121G before announcing his resignation. After being criticized by the community, he announced his resignation, and was criticized again for using his position to buy rare Moonbirds. Although he later clarified that he bought it after the public sale, it was still questioned by the community. This year In February, his new project Flux was questioned by several investors about its transparency.)

2. Moonbirds proposed the concept of soft staking. The idea itself is wonderful, but the nesting rewards did not meet expectations, and the prizes (socks, purses, etc.) did not meet expectations.

![From blue chips to "blue sorrow", a detailed count of the "six deadly sins" of Moonbirds] (https://img.gateio.im/social/moments-40baef27dd-47da569a7a-dd1a6f-62a40f)

3. Moonbirds initially adopted a holder license system similar to BAYC (simply speaking, the rights belong to the holder), but in August 2022, the team decided to switch to CC0 (Creative Commons, Open License, Mfers This is also the case), and the incident happened suddenly, without prior consultation, and the holders felt betrayed.

**4. Earlier this year, PROOF suddenly canceled the highly-anticipated PROOF conference, and then abandoned the metaverse planning Highrise and Moonbirds tokens. **So backfired, its project vision has disappeared in the public eye.

**6. Overall, the key issue may be the large gap between expectations and reality. **Moonbirds' starting point is too high, the narrative is too full, and continuous operational mistakes, and insufficient understanding of the NFT market dynamics make them take many wrong steps.

So, are the Moonbirds all over? I do not think so. We’ve all seen the revival of many crypto projects, and in theory Moonbirds has everything it takes, but it’s obviously not going to be easy to do it again.